Schroder v. City of Fort Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the failure to respond to parents’ complaints about the failure to enforce a residential speed limit was not an affirmative act
• holding that traffic laws and enforcement practices posed “a general traffic risk to pedestrians and other automobiles”
• featuring an alleged state-created-danger claim based on the city's creation of a street and setting the speed limit to 25 miles-per-hour
• failing to respond to parental complaints about the lack of enforcement of a residential speed limit in a specific neighborhood was not an affirmative act
• failing to respond to parental complaints about the lack of enforcement of a residential speed limit was not an affirmative act
• rejecting the existence of a special danger where the state’s actions “did not create a ‘special danger’ to a discrete class of individuals (of which the [plaintiff] was a member)” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).