Schreiber v. Kelsey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Restoration is not a stated exception to the statute.”
• “Restoration is not a stated exception to the statute.”
• Contract unenforceable notwithstanding unjust enrichment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Huffmaster v. Robinson
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1986-03-30· cited 27×
• Webb v. Ray
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1984-09-18· cited 12×
• Brooks v. R. A. Clark's Garage, Inc.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1977-10-17· cited 9×
• Design & Funding, Inc. v. Betz Garage, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-12-31· cited 7×
• Morris v. Gregory
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-07-18· cited 7×
• Donaldson v. Abot
  California Court of Appeal· 1987-09-09· cited 2×
• Al Poller and Deb Poller v. Okoboji Classic Cars, LLC
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2021-06-04

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bennett v. Hayes
  California Court of Appeal· 1975-12-15· cited 18×
• Schreiber v. Kelsey
  Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California· 1976-09-15· cited 7×

Other cases named Schreiber v. Kelsey

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Schreiber v. Kelsey
  Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California· 1976-09-15· cited 7×