Schreiber v. Camm

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining estate owner was not liable for torts committed by employees of independent-contractor security company because “the deployment of an armed security guard is not an inherently or abnormally dangerous activity, absent knowledge (imputed or actual
• “the use of armed security guards 8 to protect one’s property is not so inherently dangerous as to confer a nondelegable duty upon the landowner”
• “Courts that have addressed the issue have concluded that the use of armed security guards to protect one’s property is not so inherently dangerous as to confer a nondelegable duty upon the landowner.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).