· 6/26/2001
Schrecker v. U.S. Department of Justice
Citations
- 254 F.3d 162
- 349 U.S. App. D.C. 85
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 14234
- 2001 WL 709207
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that “the death of the subject of personal information does diminish to some extent the privacy interest in that information”
- declaring that the “FBI does not research third-party names internally to discover social security” numbers
- noting that “the death of the subject of personal information does diminish to some extent the privacy interest in that information, though it by no means extinguishes that interest”
- finding that crimes of passport fraud and contempt of Congress merit an inference of implied confidentiality where the informant reported “facts known only by those involved in the same criminal enterprise” as the criminal involved in the passport fraud and contempt of Congress
- reversing grant of summary judgment to agency, which had \point[ed] to nothing in the record to suggest that the search actually required will be unduly burdensome\
- reversing grant of summary judgment to agency, which had “point[ed] to nothing in the record to suggest that the search actually required will be unduly burdensome”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garland, Ginsburg, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.