· 10/13/1966
Schrank v. Meade
Citations
- 145 N.W.2d 514
- 1966 N.D. LEXIS 119
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating a resulting trust is based upon the doctrine that valuable consideration was paid by one party, but legal title taken in another
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Teigen, Strutz, Erickstad, Knud-Son, Murray
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.