District Court of Appeal of Florida· 8/7/1979
Schramm v. State
Citations
- 374 So. 2d 1043
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an interrogation conducted solely at the hands of the police is not an official proceeding within the statutory definition
- an interrogation conducted solely by the police at a police station is not an official proceeding
- police questioning not \official proceeding\ under Florida perjury law
- finding statement under oath to police is not “official proceeding”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haverfield, C.J., and Barkdull and Kehoe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Delgado-Santos v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-06-11· cited 25×
- Bowen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-06-08· cited 22×
- State v. MeehanNebraska Court of Appeals· 1998-09-15· cited 15×
- Gawronski v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-01-11· cited 8×
- Robinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-08-09· cited 8×
- State v. AdkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-11-30· cited 6×
- Nessmith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-06-24· cited 4×
- Sevin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-11-22· cited 2×
- Tardif v. People for the Ethical Treatment of AnimalsM.D. Florida· 2011-11-04· cited 2×
- Octavius Ware v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-02-15· cited 1×
- Bowen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-09-10· cited 1×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.