Schrader v. Tomlinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that pursuant to “Little Tucker Act,” Equal Pay Act claim must be brought in Court of Federal Claims
• stating that “it is well established” that EPA claims must satisfy the jurisdictional requirements of the Tucker Act
• “[A] plaintiff may not rely on the continuing violation theory where she was aware of the discriminatory conduct at the time it occurred.”
• “Because the two motions are analyzed under the same standard, a court 25 considering a motion for judgment on the pleadings may give leave to amend and ‘may dismiss causes 2 (C.D. Cal. 2004); see also Bly-Magee v. California, 236 F.3d 1014, 1019 (9th Cir. 2001

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).