Schrader v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a circuit court did not have jurisdiction to rule on a defendant’s rule 3.800(a) motion filed during the pendency of his direct appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-19
• Baker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-09-01

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Day v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-11-09· cited 12×