Schrader v. QuikTrip Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[t]he abutter’s easement was created to protect the right of ingress and egress, not to compensate abutting property owners for alterations made to a public roadway that reduces parking, traffic, or visibility”
• where notice of appeal only referred to trial court’s entry of summary judgment and not subsequent dismissal of another claim, Court of Appeals was limited to a review of the entry of summary judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).