Schrack v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing general rule that minor children may bring action only by way of parent or next friend
• refusing to recognize the parental consortium action in personal injury cases because the problems raised by the action would outweigh the benefits
• refusing to recognize the parental consortium action in personal injury cases because the problems raised by the action would outweigh the benefits
• declining to recognize cause of action for loss of parental consortium on ground that “we would have to impose arbitrary limitations on the scope of the cause of action in order to avoid the creation of a practically unlimited class of potential plaintiffs”
• discussing cases in which this court previously has rejected claims of third-party liability and concluding that, ‘‘if the presence of a genuine injury were legally sufficient to impose [third-party] liability, the only limi- tations on such liability would be the far reaches of foreseeability’’
• evaluation of principal could not be disseminated by superintendent without principal’s consent pursuant to § 10-151c

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).