· 10/6/2014
Schotz v. United States
Citations
- 135 S. Ct. 247
- 190 L. Ed. 2d 235
- 83 U.S.L.W. 3195
- 2014 U.S. LEXIS 6305
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- assessing successive petition under three-step test and explaining that “while denial of relief to a prisoner in a prior proceeding is not a bar,” court may consider prior application and “may decline to entertain the new application”
- expressly adopting three-part framework for evaluating successive petitions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Consideration, Kagantook
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.