Skip to main content
· 10/6/2014

Schotz v. United States

Citations

  • 135 S. Ct. 247
  • 190 L. Ed. 2d 235
  • 83 U.S.L.W. 3195
  • 2014 U.S. LEXIS 6305

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • assessing successive petition under three-step test and explaining that “while denial of relief to a prisoner in a prior proceeding is not a bar,” court may consider prior application and “may decline to entertain the new application”
  • expressly adopting three-part framework for evaluating successive petitions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Consideration, Kagantook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.