Schotz v. Samuels

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Exemption 7(F) “affords broad protection to the identities of individuals mentioned in law enforcement files . . . , including any individual reasonably at risk of harm” (alteration in original
• finding that the PSR was not improperly withheld when plaintiff could access it through BOP’s procedures
• finding that “the defendant's declarant has reasonably explained that a search of the plaintiff's central file was likely ‘to locate and provide all [responsive] documents’ because it is the location where the requested documents are routinely maintained”
• finding “no improper withholding” of PSR which plaintiff “could access . . . by reviewing [it] in accordance with BOP policy”
• denying litigation costs where the plaintiff did not contest any claimed exemptions, and where the Court found the exemptions properly supported
• Exemption 7(F) “affords broad protection to the identities of individuals mentioned in law enforcement files…, including any individual reasonably at risk of harm”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).