Skip to main content
· 2/5/2009

Schornhorst v. Ford Motor Co.

Citations

  • 606 F. Supp. 2d 658
  • 46 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2060
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8781
  • 2009 WL 275727

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to award prejudgment interest based on the conclusion that the jury award was sufficient to compensate the prevailing party
  • discussing the split in authority but ultimately finding “insufficient basis for application of the doctrine of waiver.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gerald E. Rosen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.