Schor v. ContiCommodity Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress, breach of implied covenant of good faith, breach of contract, and violation of state’s Unfair Trade Practices Act were pre-empted by ERISA
• concluding, in a case decided before Pilot but consistent with it, that an action alleging improper claims processing is not saved from preemption because it does not regulate the business of insurance under ERISA
• concluding, in a case decided before Pilot Life but consistent with it, that an action alleging improper claims processing is not saved from preemption because it does not regulate the business of insurance under ERISA
• concluding, in a case decided before Pilot Life but consistent with it, that an action alleging improper claims processing is not saved from preemption because it does not regulate the business of insurance under ERISA
• concluding, in a case decided before Pilot but consistent with it, that an action alleging improper claims processing is not saved from preemption because it does not regulate the business of insurance under ERISA
• rejecting plaintiff's argument that beneficiaries may seek extra-contractual damages from a fiduciary as \other appropriate equitable relief\ under traditional principles of trust law which Congress intended to engraft upon ERISA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).