Skip to main content

Schoonover v. State

Citations

  • 64 P.3d 677

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “although RCW 4.96.020 does not expressly require verification of a tort claim against a local government agency, it does contain language from which we can infer such a requirement”
  • setting forth elements of equitable estoppel under Washington law
  • dismissal for lack of subject 16 17 18 4 The Court also notes that Mr. Norwick failed to plead any objective 19 symptomology of emotional distress, a necessary element of an NIED claim. See 20 Repin v. State, 198 Wn. App. 243, 263, 392 P.3d 1174 (2017

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Houghton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.