Court of Appeals of Washington· 3/11/2003
Schoonover v. State
Citations
- 64 P.3d 677
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “although RCW 4.96.020 does not expressly require verification of a tort claim against a local government agency, it does contain language from which we can infer such a requirement”
- setting forth elements of equitable estoppel under Washington law
- dismissal for lack of subject 16 17 18 4 The Court also notes that Mr. Norwick failed to plead any objective 19 symptomology of emotional distress, a necessary element of an NIED claim. See 20 Repin v. State, 198 Wn. App. 243, 263, 392 P.3d 1174 (2017
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Houghton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. McKagueCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2011-01-19· cited 22×
- Delos Reyes v. City of RentonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-02-02· cited 12×
- Johnson v. KING COUNTY (METRO TRANSIT)Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-01-12· cited 8×
- Estate of Connelly v. SNOHOMISH CTY. PUBLIC UTILITY DIST.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-07-21· cited 7×
- Gates v. Port of KalamaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-09-01· cited 7×
- Estate of Connelly v. Snohomish County Public Utility District No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-07-21· cited 7×
- Johnson v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-01-12· cited 6×
- Reyes v. City of RentonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-03-22· cited 5×
- Nor-Pac Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of LicensingCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-09-13· cited 3×
- Newsom v. Bremerton School DistrictNinth Circuit· 2009-08-12
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court· 2002-03-28· cited 1,615×
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court· 2002-03-28· cited 1,608×
- Lybbert v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court· 2000-06-08· cited 365×
- Smith v. Stillwell-SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1998-12-24· cited 313×
- State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court· 1997-02-06· cited 164×
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. TheodoratusWashington Supreme Court· 1998-07-02· cited 109×
- Department of Ecology v. TheodoratusWashington Supreme Court· 1998-07-02· cited 109×
- Seeley v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 1997-07-24· cited 105×
- State v. McCrawWashington Supreme Court· 1995-07-20· cited 102×
- State v. HenningsWashington Supreme Court· 1996-07-18· cited 101×
- DeYoung v. Providence Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court· 1998-08-27· cited 96×
- Fell v. Spokane Transit AuthorityWashington Supreme Court· 1996-02-29· cited 93×
- State v. WrightWashington Supreme Court· 1974-12-12· cited 89×
- Gossett v. Farmers Ins. Co. of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court· 1997-12-24· cited 76×
- Gossett v. Farmers InsuranceWashington Supreme Court· 1997-12-24· cited 75×
- Omega National Insurance v. MarquardtWashington Supreme Court· 1990-10-25· cited 74×
- Automobile Drivers & Demonstrators Union Local No. 882 v. Department of Retirement SystemsWashington Supreme Court· 1979-08-02· cited 62×
- Bour v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-02-16· cited 49×
- Daggs v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 2003-08-01· cited 33×
- Griffith v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court· 1996-09-12· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.