Skip to main content
· 6/26/2007

Schoonover v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc.

Citations

  • 492 F. Supp. 2d 1103
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46754
  • 2007 WL 1828885

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing a thorough review of the legal standard for the “causality” element of the prima facie case and requiring circumstances that suggest discrimination
  • stating knowledge of decision maker of protected activity, together with timing of filing, may establish causation
  • different treatment of similarly situated employees \[o]ne way\ to prove the fourth element but biased comments by a decisionmaker also sufficient
  • different treatment of similarly situated employees \[o]ne way\ to prove the fourth element but biased comments by a decisionmaker also sufficient
  • \Engagement in a statutorily protected activity occurs where the plaintiff files a formal complaint protesting the allegedly unlawful activity ....\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gritzner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.