School District of Philadelphia, Com. of Pa. v. Kurtz Bros.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding venue improper where defendant’s in-district activity did “not amount to transacting business in any substantial manner,” as the activities were “extremely light, sporadic and unsolicited”
• “[Wjhen applying the transacting business test, the defendant must still be conducting substantial business in this district at the time of the commencement of the action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).