School District No. 116 v. School District No. 141

Citations

• 79 Kan. 407
• 99 P. 620
• 1909 Kan. LEXIS 203

Syllabus

<p>1. School Districts — Parties — Control of Litigation. Where an attorney appeared on behalf of a school district, and it was not shown that he was authorized by the school-district meeting to do so, it was said the director of the school district had full general authority to represent the district and control the action.</p> <p>2. - Attorneys—Substitution—Dismissal of Action. The school board’s motion to dismiss the action was allowed, but it was said the proper procedure would have been, when the attorney refused to comply with the director’s wishes, to apply to the court for a substitution of attorneys.</p>