Schoneberger v. Oelze

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendants argued plaintiffs could not “demand benefits under the Trusts without accepting all of them terms”
• “In the arbitration context, a nonsignatory to an agreement requiring arbitration may be estopped, that is, barred, from avoiding arbitration if that party is claiming or has received direct benefits from the contract.”
• nonparty to arbitration clause may be bound to ai’bitrate by estoppel
• “In the arbitration context, a nonsignatory to an agreement requiring arbitration may 22 be estopped, that is, barred, from avoiding arbitration if that party is claiming or has 23 received direct benefits from the contract.”
• “In the 8 arbitration context, a nonsignatory to an agreement requiring arbitration may be estopped, 9 that is, barred, from avoiding arbitration if that party is claiming or has received direct 10 benefits from the contract.”
• “Arbitration is a creature of contract law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Hal Rachal, Jr. v. John W. Reitz
  Texas Supreme Court· 2013-05-03· cited 154×
• State v. Grell
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2006-06-06· cited 59×
• Dueñas v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-10-21· cited 44×
• The ESTATE OF JOSEFA U. DeCAMACHO v. LA SOLANA CARE AND REHAB, INC.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-01-14· cited 37×
• Valer C. Austin v. Josiah T. Austin
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-04-30· cited 27×
• Escareno Ex Rel. Estate of Escareno v. Kindred Nursing Centers West, L.L.C.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-01-26· cited 11×
• McArthur v. McArthur
  California Court of Appeal· 2014-03-11· cited 9×
• Helen Yu-Wen Chang v. Siu
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-04-22· cited 7×
• In Re Calomiris
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-03-02· cited 6×
• Rachal v. Reitz
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2011-07-22· cited 5×
• Dos Picos Land Ltd. Partnership v. Pima County
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-09-29· cited 4×
• DOS PICOS LAND LTD. v. Pima County
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-08-31
• Crawford Professional Drugs, Inc. v. CVS Caremark Corp.
  Fifth Circuit· 2014-04-04
• Dos Picos Land Limited Partnership Shepard v. Pima County
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2010-09-29
• Allstate v. Watts
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2018-02-06
• Jacob Benson v. Casa De Capri Ent
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2022-01-20
• Rli Insurance Company v. National Construction & Development, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2024-10-28

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications Workers
  Supreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 4,474×
• Bridas S.A.P.I.C. v. Government of Turkmenistan
  Fifth Circuit· 2003-09-15· cited 352×
• International Paper Company v. Schwabedissen Maschinen & Anlagen Gmbh
  Fourth Circuit· 2000-03-14· cited 327×
• E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Co. v. Rhone Poulenc Fiber and Resin Intermediates, S.A.S.
  Third Circuit· 2001-10-15· cited 324×
• Rancho Pescado, Inc. v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-01-17· cited 98×
• Broemmer v. Abortion Services of Phoenix, Ltd.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1992-10-13· cited 91×
• Southern California Edison Co. v. Peabody Western Coal Co.
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1999-05-19· cited 78×
• Smith Barney, Inc. v. Henry
  Mississippi Supreme Court· 2001-01-11· cited 51×
• Lansford v. Harris
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-10-20· cited 37×
• Stevens/Leinweber/Sullens, Inc. v. Holm Development & Management, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1990-08-07· cited 34×
• Jeanes v. Arrow Insurance Company
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-03-27· cited 29×
• Bennett v. Appaloosa Horse Club
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-12-06· cited 25×
• In Re Naarden Trust
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-06-16· cited 7×