· 8/31/2004
Schoneberger v. Oelze
Citations
- 96 P.3d 1078
- 208 Ariz. 591
- 433 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 16
- 2004 Ariz. App. LEXIS 125
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendants argued plaintiffs could not “demand benefits under the Trusts without accepting all of them terms”
- “In the arbitration context, a nonsignatory to an agreement requiring arbitration may be estopped, that is, barred, from avoiding arbitration if that party is claiming or has received direct benefits from the contract.”
- nonparty to arbitration clause may be bound to ai’bitrate by estoppel
- “In the arbitration context, a nonsignatory to an agreement requiring arbitration may 22 be estopped, that is, barred, from avoiding arbitration if that party is claiming or has 23 received direct benefits from the contract.”
- “In the 8 arbitration context, a nonsignatory to an agreement requiring arbitration may be estopped, 9 that is, barred, from avoiding arbitration if that party is claiming or has received direct 10 benefits from the contract.”
- “Arbitration is a creature of contract law.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Norris, Gemmill, Kessler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.