Skip to main content
· 8/31/2004

Schoneberger v. Oelze

Citations

  • 96 P.3d 1078
  • 208 Ariz. 591
  • 433 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 16
  • 2004 Ariz. App. LEXIS 125

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendants argued plaintiffs could not “demand benefits under the Trusts without accepting all of them terms”
  • “In the arbitration context, a nonsignatory to an agreement requiring arbitration may be estopped, that is, barred, from avoiding arbitration if that party is claiming or has received direct benefits from the contract.”
  • nonparty to arbitration clause may be bound to ai’bitrate by estoppel
  • “In the arbitration context, a nonsignatory to an agreement requiring arbitration may 22 be estopped, that is, barred, from avoiding arbitration if that party is claiming or has 23 received direct benefits from the contract.”
  • “In the 8 arbitration context, a nonsignatory to an agreement requiring arbitration may be estopped, 9 that is, barred, from avoiding arbitration if that party is claiming or has received direct 10 benefits from the contract.”
  • “Arbitration is a creature of contract law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Norris, Gemmill, Kessler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.