Schoneberger v. Fey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding for trial where “there is some proof of support and control but it contains nothing which compels an inference that the defendant had a full and complete parental interest in the well-being and general welfare of the infant plaintiff”
• “[n]o good reason” exists why parent-child immunity should be applied to a natural parent and not in the case of one standing in loco 'parentis
• \[n]o good reason\ exists why parent-child immunity should be applied to a natural parent and not in the case of one standing in loco parentis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).