Scholfield Auto Plaza, L.L.C. v. Carganza, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “to prevail under either theory, plaintiff must prove (1) it owns a valid, protectable [ ]mark and (2) defendant’s [mark] is so similar to plaintiffs it is likely to cause consumer confusion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).