Schofield v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a trial court must attach record portions conclusively refuting a facially sufficient 3.853 motion or conduct an evidentiary hearing
• holding that the trial court erred in denying a facially sufficient rule 3.853 motion without holding an evi-dentiai'y hearing or attaching portions of the trial transcript indicating that the defendant would not be exonerated
• concluding that in a case where the only evidence of physical contact was defensive stab wounds on the victim, DNA evidence revealing material from a third party “would create a reasonable probability that [the defendant] would [have been] acquitted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-10-19· cited 4×
• Girley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-07-31· cited 3×
• Reddick v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-12· cited 3×
• Nathaniel Poole, Jr. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-09-07· cited 3×
• Padgett v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-05-19· cited 1×
• Dubose v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-06-08· cited 1×
• Ira L. Lane v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-04-02
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-21

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Knighten v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-09-04· cited 15×
• Riley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-07-30· cited 6×