Schofield v. City of St. Paul

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “we have found ‘resign or be fired’ threats to constitute constructive -6- discharge”
• declining to review additional alleged evidentiary issues when remanding for new trial \[blecause it is unknown what specific evidence will be introduced on remand and what objections might be raised\
• declining to express any opinion on additional appealed evidentiary issues once one required remand \[blecause it is unknown what specific evidence will be introduced on remand and what objections might be raised\
• \We review a trial court's admission or exclusion of evidence for abuse of discretion.\ (citing Getchell v. Lodge, 65 P.3d 50, 53 (Alaska 2003))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).