Skip to main content
· 2/9/2011

Schoenman v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

Citations

  • 763 F. Supp. 2d 173
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12560
  • 2011 WL 446857

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the question of segregability is context-specific and that an agency need not commit significant time and resources to the separation of disjointed words, phrases, or sentences that would provide minimal informational content
  • finding “no authority within this Circuit . . . providing that a 12.9% error rate” warrants complete reprocessing
  • upholding invocation of Exemption 7(D) where FBI “explain[ed], in a reasonably detailed and non-conclusory manner, that the information at issue in each instance was received in connection with an express grant of confidentiality”
  • finding all of these categories of information to be exempt under Exemption 7(C)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Colleen Kollar-Kotelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.