Schoenhals v. Close

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[e]ven though a party has violated a restrictive covenant and is able to continue to do so under . . . [the defenses of limitations, waiver, or laches], the restrictive covenant will continue to exist”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).