Schoenfeld v. FDL Foods, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the exclusion of an evaluation report “would run contrary to the primary purpose of the workers’ compensation statute, which is for the benefit of the worker”
• “Exclusion of evidence is the most severe sanction available under Iowa Rule of Civil Procedure 125(c), the rule concerning discovery of ex- perts, and is justified only when prejudice would result.”
• “The imposition of sanctions by administrative agencies is discretionary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).