Schoeneman v. Fairfax County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming grant of summary judgment on plaintiffs’ Section 1983 conspiracy claim because the court had “already determined that a jury could not decide in favor of plaintiffs” on their underlying malicious prosecution and denial of the right to a fair trial claims
• prosecutors’ “actions . . . in issuing subpoenas after the grand jury investigations were opened are entitled to absolute immunity” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).