Skip to main content
· 3/28/2002

Schoendorf v. U.D. Registry, Inc.

Citations

  • 118 Cal. Rptr. 2d 313
  • 97 Cal. App. 4th 227
  • 2002 Daily Journal DAR 3417
  • 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2817
  • 2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 3425
  • 2002 WL 471278

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the California Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act, being more specific, prevails over the litigation privilege, which is more gen eral
  • “to the extent that the [California Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act ... ] cannot be reconciled with the [litigation] privilege, the CCRAA ..., being more specific, prevails] over the litigation privilege, which is more general.”
  • “[T]o the extent that the [California Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act] and [the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act] cannot be reconciled with the [litigation] privilege, the CCRAA and FCRA, being more specific, prevail over the litigation privilege, which is more general.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mallano

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.