Schoen v. Kansas Department of Revenue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the appellant failed to provide any material from the criminal proceeding, which precluded meaningful appellate review of a collateral estoppel claim
• pursuant to K.S.A. 8-1020[h][2][F], court addressed substantial compliance with KDHE protocols for administering breath test when officer failed to visually check to see if tubing running from simulator solution to Intoxilyzer 5000 was properly attached prior to administering breath test
• court found substantial compliance with requirement that officer check to make sure tubing was properly connected even though officer did not visually do so; court noted that if tubing was not properly connected, the officer would have heard a difference or the machine would not have worked

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).