· 9/18/1997
SCHOEN BY AND THROUGH SCHOEN v. Spotlight Co.
Citations
- 979 F. Supp. 1379
- 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15799
- 1997 WL 627123
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that there was no presumption because the regulation identified did not address warnings
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Van Bebber
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.