Schobinger v. Ivey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• re-examining imputation of negligence after adoption of comparative negligence “due to the fact that we no longer have the harsh result that would occur under the prior contributory negligence law”
• “[W]e believe that fairness requires that an authorized driver’s negligence should be considered in determining the extent of the family vehicle owner’s recovery against third parties for damages to the family vehicle.”
• “[W]e believe that fairness requires that an authorized driver’s negligence should be considered in determining the extent of the family vehicle owner’s recovery against third parties for damages to the family vehicle.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).