Schnupp v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a charge of aiding and abetting in the possession of narcotics was defamatory per se
• holding that a charge of aiding and abetting in the possession of narcotics was defamatory per se
• holding that a charge of aiding and abetting in the possession of narcotics was defamatory per se
• allowing $200,000 non-pecuniary damages award to stand, but detailing specific injury to reputation and detailed information regarding the effect of the defamation on plaintiff and his family
• “[The defendant] suggests that the defamatoiy words must be sufficient within themselves to establish all the elements of the offense imputed. Such specificity, however, is not required.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).