Skip to main content
· 1/26/2005

Schnitzer Investment Corp. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London

Citations

  • 104 P.3d 1162
  • 197 Or. App. 147
  • 2005 Ore. App. LEXIS 61

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that orders from the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality can'trigger the duty to defend
  • recognizing that orders from the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality can trigger the duty to defend
  • holding that underlying letter raised possibility of allegations of contaminated groundwater, even though letter did not expressly mention groundwater
  • stating that the duty to defend arises when there is “any basis for which the insurer provides coverage,” even if the suit also alleges conduct beyond the policy’s coverage
  • construing similar language to require service on Oregon director of department of consumer and business services for award of attorney’s fees
  • insurer argued that the administrative documents in question alleged damage only to the insured’s soil, which would not have been covered by the policy, instead of damage to the groundwater, which was covered by the policy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmonds, Wollheim, Schuman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.