· 4/29/1968
Schnitt v. McKellar
Citations
- 427 S.W.2d 202
- 244 Ark. 377
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “[treatment of the words ‘working interest’ as meaning something other than their purely technical definition is not novel” and that “it is often used to denote merely an interest in the mineral rights”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fogleman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.