Skip to main content
· 4/29/1968

Schnitt v. McKellar

Citations

  • 427 S.W.2d 202
  • 244 Ark. 377

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[treatment of the words ‘working interest’ as meaning something other than their purely technical definition is not novel” and that “it is often used to denote merely an interest in the mineral rights”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fogleman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.