Skip to main content
· 3/18/1974

Schnitger v. Backus

Citations

  • 519 P.2d 1315
  • 10 Wash. App. 754
  • 14 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 750
  • 1974 Wash. App. LEXIS 1497

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Possession is a requisite to the status of ‘holder in due course’; and therefore following the release of the check . . . , the bank could not claim to be a ‘holder in due course’ as to another claimant who might come into possession of the reissued check.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Callow

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.