· 3/18/1974
Schnitger v. Backus
Citations
- 519 P.2d 1315
- 10 Wash. App. 754
- 14 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 750
- 1974 Wash. App. LEXIS 1497
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Possession is a requisite to the status of ‘holder in due course’; and therefore following the release of the check . . . , the bank could not claim to be a ‘holder in due course’ as to another claimant who might come into possession of the reissued check.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Callow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.