New York Supreme Court· 10/26/1953
Schneider v. Schneider
Citations
- 204 Misc. 918
- 125 N.Y.S.2d 739
- 1953 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2363
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “reasons for which restitution is generally directed do not apply either to temporary or permanent alimony”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sayrol
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Biewend v. BiewendCalifornia Supreme Court· 1941-01-28· cited 119×
- Averett v. AverettNew York Supreme Court· 1920-03-15· cited 24×
- Averett v. AverettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1920-04-15· cited 19×
- Griffin v. GriffinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1927-02-11· cited 18×
- Davis v. WelberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1951-03-13· cited 14×
- Binck v. WoodNew York Supreme Court· 1864-03-07· cited 11×
- Matthews v. MatthewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1924-11-14· cited 6×
- Roth v. SchlossNew York Supreme Court· 1849-05-01· cited 5×
- Finkelstone v. LanzkeNew York Supreme Court· 1909-05-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.