Schneider v. Schneider

Citations

• 2020 Ohio 4326

Syllabus

The trial court did not err by finding that appellant's retirement from federal government service in 2002 triggered his obligation to pay appellee under the terms of their separation agreement. Nor did the court err by finding that the reverse-mortgage payments that appellee received were not part of her \gross income.\ Finally, the court did not err by holding appellant in contempt for not paying appellee or in awarding appellee attorney fees related to the contempt proceedings. Judgment affirmed.