Schneider v. Schneider

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• language complied with section 61.13 by identifying three aspects of the children’s lives— health, education, and travel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Smith v. Smith
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-12-31· cited 18×
• Santo v. Santo
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2016-07-11· cited 18×
• Fazzaro v. Fazzaro
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-03-08· cited 9×
• McClure v. Beck
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-03-08· cited 4×
• SHARONIT AMAR SELIGSOHN v. JACOB SELIGSOHN
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-11-28· cited 2×
• Whetstine v. Steiner
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-06-23· cited 1×
• CASSIO S. AIALA v. JAIME LARKIN
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-03-03
• ZACHARY RANKIN v. BLAINE LOUNSBURY
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-03-15

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hedendal v. Hedendal
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-09· cited 13×
• Kuharcik v. Kuharcik
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-12-08· cited 6×
• McKeever v. McKeever
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-08-29· cited 3×
• Santiago v. Santiago
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-01-28· cited 1×