Schneider v. Chrysler Motors Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming § 103 rejection when § 102 rejection would also have been appropriate
• affirming § 103 rejection when § 102 rejection would also have been appropriate
• inventor’s recognition that prior-art compound inhibited defects in peanut plants did not suffice to grant patent protection on that compound
• intended use of an old composition does not render composition claim patentable
• intended use of an old composition does not render composition claim patentable
• intended use of an old composition does not render composition claim patentable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).