Skip to main content
· 8/1/1890

Schneider v. Brown

Citations

  • 85 Cal. 205
  • 24 P. 715
  • 1890 Cal. LEXIS 896

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to consider errors beyond those raised in an application for discretionary appeal
  • “The issues on appeal are limited by the errors enumerated in the application for discretionary appeal.”
  • “When we do limit the scope of review more narrowly, we do so explicitly.”
  • “An application for discretionary review must enumerate the errors to be urged on appeal, and so, when we grant discretionary review, it necessarily is limited to the errors actually enumerated in the application.”
  • “An application for discretionary review must ‘enumerat[e] the errors to be urged on appeal,’ OCGA § 5-6-35 (b), and so, when we grant discretionary review, it necessarily is limited to the errors actually enumerated in the application.”
  • appellate court may limit grant of application for discretionary review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hayne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.