Schneider v. Arrow Tank & Engineering

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• habeas jurisdiction is lacking, and a civil rights action instead is 13 appropriate, “where a successful challenge to a prison condition will not necessarily 14 shorten the prisoner’s sentence”
• habeas jurisdiction is lacking, and a civil rights 26 action instead is appropriate, \where a successful challenge to a prison condition will not 27 necessarily shorten the prisoner's sentence\
• habeas jurisdiction is lacking, and a civil rights action instead is appropriate, 19 “where a successful challenge to a prison condition will not necessarily shorten the 20 prisoner’s sentence”
• habeas jurisdiction is lacking, and a civil rights action instead is 18 appropriate, “where a successful challenge to a prison condition will not necessarily 19 shorten the prisoner’s sentence”
• habeas jurisdiction is 14 lacking, and a civil rights action instead is appropriate, “where a successful 15 challenge to a prison condition will not necessarily shorten the prisoner’s 16 sentence”
• habeas jurisdiction is 21 lacking, and a civil rights action instead is appropriate, “where a successful 22 challenge to a prison condition will not necessarily shorten the prisoner’s 23 sentence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).