Schneberger v. Wheeler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant’s conduct must be at minimum reckless or callous to impose punitive damages under § 1983
• holding that a defendant’s conduct must be at minimum reckless or callous to impose punitive damages under § 1983
• holding that a defendant’s conduct must be at minimum reckless or callous to impose punitive damages under § 1983
• vacating potentially overlapping compensatory damages award and equitable back pay award and remanding for a new trial and recalculation of back pay by the district judge
• vacating potentially overlapping compensatory damages award and equitable back pay award and remanding for a new trial and recalculation of back pay by the district judge
• affirming district court’s decision to admit under 801(d)(2)(A) statements by the deceased commissioner of transportation authority in a case against the commissioner, the authority, and some of its board of directors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).