Skip to main content
· 6/7/1905

Schnack v. Montano

Citations

  • 16 Haw. 805

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • prejudicial failure to follow the requirements of a regulation constitutes, as a matter of law, clear and unmistakable error
  • undisputed facts of record at time of earlier adjudication required CUE-based award of higher disability rating retroactive to date of prior adjudication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.