Skip to main content
· 8/27/1979

Schmitz v. United States Bakery

Citations

  • 41 Or. App. 749
  • 599 P.2d 471
  • 1979 Ore. App. LEXIS 3170

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • one of six bases for attacking pleadings pursuant to section 2-615 is that the pleading fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted
  • section 2-619 motion need not be accompanied by supporting material if the affirmative matter appears on the face of the complaint or can be determined as a matter of law
  • “section 2-619 motions should not be used to attack the factual basis of the claim itself; if such an attack is to be made, it should be by a summary judgment motion”
  • if a defendant wishes to challenge the factual sufficiency of a plaintiff’s claim, a summary judgment motion is the proper vehicle, whereas a section 2-619 motion to dismiss asserts other affirmative matters avoiding the legal effect of or defeating the claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buttler, Joseph, Schwab, Thornton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.