Schmitz v. South Cov. & Cin. St. Ry. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Rule 15(a)(2) applies to Rule 12(c) motions
• “[T]here certainly is no categorical rule that judgment on the pleadings is per se with prejudice.”
• “[T]here certainly is no categorical rule that judgment on the pleadings is per se with prejudice.”
• “the evidence must show that the corporation’s owners abused the legal separation of a corporation from its owners” (citations omitted)
• “veil-piercing is not a separate cause of action”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).