Skip to main content
· 2/28/1995

Schmitz v. Crotty

Citations

  • 528 N.W.2d 112
  • 1995 WL 81367

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • involving a breach of a duty to beneficiaries when attorney mishandled a tax return that resulted in higher taxes than should have been paid and improperly reduced the share of the estate to the beneficiaries
  • attorney breached duty owed to beneficiaries to exercise reasonable skill and care in handling an estate
  • reasonableness of attorney’s conduct ordinarily a question of fact, but where facts so compelling that no conflicting inferences available, then whether attorney performed duty is decided as a matter of law by the court
  • outlining elements of legal malpractice claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGiverin, Neuman, Snell, Andreasen, Ternus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.