Schmitt v. New York Rapid Transit Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming appellate court’s dismissal of action against municipality for failing to comply with Notice of Claim requirements under N.Y. Gen. Mun. Law §§ 50-e and 50-i
• cancer detection center, which performed a diagnostic examination on the decedent in February 1968 and again in February 1969, did not render continuous treatment
• malpractice action against the City for misdiagnosis of carcinoma of plaintiff’s right breast which ultimately caused her death barred because Notice of Claim was not timely filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).