Schmisseur v. Beatrie
Citations
- 147 Ill. 210
- 35 N.E. 525
Syllabus
<p>1. Mabbiag-e—previous marriage existing. A second marriage is-void when either of the parties to it has a husband or wife by a former marriage, who has never been divorced and is still living.</p> <p>2. Same—presumption in favor of its validity. Where a marriage has-once been solemnized according to the forms of law, every presumption will be indulged in favor of its validity. This presumption is so strong that a former husband or wife will be presumed to be dead after an absence of less than seven years. The ordinary presumption in favor of the continuance of human life is made to give way to the presumption in favor of the innocence of a second marriage.</p> <p>3. ' Same—presumption of a divorce prior to a second marriage. A previous divorce will often be presumed in order to sustain a second marriage. So when two marriages of a man, and the existence of his-first wife, are established by proof, a presumption will arise in favor of a divorce from his first wife, in order to sustain the second marriage, and the burden of proof will rest upon the party asserting the illegality of such marriage to show that no divorce was had before the last marriage.</p> <p>4. Same—subsequent divorce will not legalize second marriage. Where a man, at the time of marriage, has a wife living and undivorced, a subsequent divorce obtained by his first wife will not legalize his second marriage.</p> <p>5. Same—evidence rebutting presumption of a divorce. In 1872 a man- and woman were married in St. Clair county, where they both resided all their lives, and on November 14, 1876, he filed his bill in that court for a divorce against his wife, and on the same day he was married to-an other woman and suffered the bill to be dismissed: Held, that such bill was evidence that at the time of his second marriage he had.no-divorce from his first wife.</p> <p>6. In the same case, the parties questioning the validity of the second marriage not only gave in evidence the bill for divorce filed by t
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A second marriage is void where either of the parties to it has a husband or wife by a former marriage who has never been divorced and is still living.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Magruder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mozell Grey v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesSecond Circuit· 1983-10-24· cited 785×
- Levine v. PascalAppellate Court of Illinois· 1968-04-03· cited 95×
- Hunter v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court· 1896-02-15· cited 84×
- Mary Davis, Cross-Appellant v. Joseph A. Califano, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, Cross-AppelleeSeventh Circuit· 1979-07-25· cited 40×
- Potter v. ClappIllinois Supreme Court· 1903-06-16· cited 40×
- Branford Baptist Church v. NicholsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1949-01-11· cited 31×
- Alabama & Vicksburg Railway Co. v. BeardsleyMississippi Supreme Court· 1901-10-15· cited 31×
- Estes v. MerrillSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1915-12-13· cited 26×
- Brown v. ParksSupreme Court of Georgia· 1931-07-14· cited 24×
- Cole v. ColeIllinois Supreme Court· 1894-10-30· cited 20×
- In re Estate of SanduskyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1943-10-25· cited 20×
- Zero Wholesale Gas Co., Inc. v. StroudSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1978-10-09· cited 19×
- Sparling v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court· 1971-04-01· cited 13×
- Waggoner v. DedmoreAppellate Court of Illinois· 1930-05-22· cited 13×
- Hewitt v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.E.D. Virginia· 1980-06-10· cited 12×
- Cardenas v. CardenasAppellate Court of Illinois· 1957-03-05· cited 12×
- Castruccio v. PanicoAppellate Court of Illinois· 1932-12-30· cited 8×
- Mrs. Stella Patton v. Railroad Retirement BoardFifth Circuit· 1963-02-13· cited 7×
- Sullivan v. Grand Lodge Knights of PythiasMississippi Supreme Court· 1910-03-15· cited 7×
- Cruz Quiñones v. RamosSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1949-12-20· cited 6×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Boulden v. McIntireIndiana Supreme Court· 1889-05-11· cited 57×
- Johnson v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1885-11-14· cited 55×
- Gordon v. GordonIllinois Supreme Court· 1892-03-24· cited 28×
- Coal Run Coal Co. v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court· 1886-11-13· cited 22×
- Graves v. BruenIllinois Supreme Court· 1849-12-15· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.