Schmidt v. Wilkinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating, in reference to a motion to dismiss under rule 104(b), that dismissal will be upheld where “no state of facts is conceivable under which plaintiff might show a right of recovery”
• noting the “essence of the tort is ordinarily any attempt to secure from another some collateral advantage not properly includable in the process itself” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).