Skip to main content
· 6/30/2011

Schmidt v. Van

Citations

  • 65 So. 3d 1105
  • 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 10313
  • 2011 WL 2570774

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing grant of new trial because, even though defense verdict was contrary to uncontradicted testimony of the plaintiffs expert, the jury was free to weigh and reject the expert’s testimony
  • quashed on other grounds by Van v. Schmidt, 122 So.3d 243 (Fla. 2013)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rowe, Wolf, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.